Ehran wrote:gimme the old standby of sex and violence any day.
One more thing regarding this: I know you're joking, but I actually think you're quite right.
Now, obviously, there's a big difference between explicit sex and violence and implicit, but sex and violence are 2 elements that are almost absolutely necessary for a good story (you can get by with one or another, usually, but usually you need both for a great story.) This is something that Disney once knew.
If you look at some of their 'better' animated movies, there's actually a surprising amount of violence in them:
Snow White and the Seven Dwarves: The evil queen wants to kill Snow White, and eventually gets thrown off a cliff to her death.
Bambi: Probably the movie that's caused the most emotional anguish in children, ever.
101 Dalmations: Though no violence really happens, the threat of the puppies becoming a fur coat hangs over the entire movie
Beauty and the Beast: The beast is extremely violent, and so is Gaston. Gaston is eventually thrown off a roof to his death
Lion King: Simba's father is rather brutally murdered by his brother, and Simba eventually avenges that death by killing his uncle
There are a lot of other examples, but those are some of the bigger ones, just off the top of my head. Violence, or at least the threat of violence, are usually a key element in a good story. The same is often true of sexuality, or at least hints of sexuality. You can find a whole lot of examples of that in the above movies (Snow White, in particular, caused a small uproar way back when because the kisses in it were a tad deeper than were considered appropriate at the time. Then you have good old-fashioned beastiality in Beauty and the Beast, puppies (PUPPIES for God's sake) in 101 Dalmations and Lady and the Tramp, and so on.)
Disney has been playing is way too safe for quite a while now, and their movies have suffered for it.