Chelsea Duklain wrote:Piranhas tend to school together to tear creatures apart.
Every social gathering of people has a few cliques whether it's realized by those individuals or not.
Groups of friends band together too. Would you call you and your friends a clique as well? If being friends with certain people here and occassionally agreeing with their points of view makes a piranha then I'm proud to be one.
One dictionary definition says that a clique is "a narrow circle of persons associated by common interests or for the accomplishment of a common purpose" (Webster's). I don't know how narrow my clique is, after all, for all I'm concerned, you are my friend until you prove yourself to be otherwise. But it is true that we are associated by common interests and have a common purpose. That's why whenever a whiner comes around and starts bitching about the shard for the sake of whinning, I fail to see how this helps our purpose. Of course, this is a free country and everyone can spew any amount of garbage they wish to from their mounths, but like I've said before many times before, we don't have like it.
If
you (using generic "you" here) have the freedom to come here trash the World of Dreams and its players, we possess the equal freedom to dislike it and post an appropiate response. We are entitled to demand proof and to make our case why we disagree.
Moreover, if someone else agrees with me on the boards, does that fact alone make him or her part of my "clique?" Of course not! You have the freedom to agree a disagree with anyone you choose without them having to be your friends or enemies (the enemy of your enemy is not your friend)
If merely agreeing with someone makes that someone part of the same clique, then it stands to reason that anyone who disagrees with the so-called clique's opinion would not be part of that clique right? Again, this is fallacious and unwarranted assumption. Heck, Marius and I have disagreed on more issues that I care to remember (on the boards and outside the boards), but he still part of my "clique" and so long as he continues to be my friend we'll be part of the same group of friends.
I believe the "clique" definition doesn't quite represent the kind of friendship associations we have here on WoD. Therefore, I think the definition for the word fellowship--"a close association of friends or equals sharing similar interests"--would better describe our frienship groups.
It's the Message Board Piranhas that gnash their teeth, tear, spit and chew that frustrate me.
If disagreeing with you on this one post makes me a piranha, if thinking differently from the way you do makes me a piranha, then I guess I am one. I'm sorry Chelsea but I'm not one to follow anyone else's thinking. I formulate my own opinions and choose the way I'm going to respond other people's posts. Like you said, piranhas are a collective who act and think as collective. I believe Tristan Gryphon would be greatly offended if you told him someone else was formulating his opinions for him.
That's why making generalizations about people you know nothing about is always offensive and disrespectful. I might as well be grouping you and Celeste into the "msg boards harpies" clique simply because you too happen to believe in cliques. I hope you would agree that's ridiculous. People are different and they may hold same or conflicting opinions for different reasons. There is a great danger when you stop dealing with people as individuals and start grouping them into madeup categories. Bigotry and intolerance are the inevitable results, and where there is bigotry and intolerance no friendships can survive.